|
Overview
of Age Management Medicine
The Symptoms of Aging
Catch Us Off-Guard
At 20, we’re invincible. At 30, awareness of our mortality begins
to become more evident, along with awareness of beginning diminution:
vigor and vitality, focus and sharpness, and the body’s seeming refusal
to keep pace with the spirit. As the years go by, signs and symptoms of
aging insidiously make themselves more of an issue. Fat seems to be
accumulating, and it’s no longer so easy to get rid of it. Workouts at
the gym require increasing effort to achieve results that no longer
match those of our earlier years. Increasing forgetfulness, lack of
focus, loss of skin tone and elasticity, thinning hair and a myriad of
other all-too-common woes are not restricted to a few. Most of us
experience many of the signs of aging beginning in our mid-thirties.
Until recently, we had limited options to fight them.
What is Age Management Medicine?
Age management medicine is based on the concept that sufficient
medical evidence reveals that we can improve the quality of life by
delaying the onset of signs and symptoms associated with aging. A large
body of literature not only supports this concept, but it also confirms
its safety—sans side effects and complications.
Age management medicine is defined as preventive medicine, focused on
regaining and maintaining optimal health and vigor. Issues associated
with aging—from body composition and energy to brain and sexual
function—are largely related to hormonal deficiencies. The truth is, we
start to lose one to three percent of our hormones at age 30. By the
time we turn 40, we clearly are aware of the difference. Researchers in Turku,
Finland studied 15,500 men aged 40 to 69 years. Moderate or severe sexual symptoms (decreased frequency of
erections, libido, and potency) were observed in 20% of men of the
youngest age group of 40 to 44 years. The proportion of men with
significant symptoms increased linearly with age up to 67% in the oldest
age group (65 to 69 years). Other symptoms did not show a similar age
trend. On multifactor analysis, sexual symptoms were independently
associated with decreased life satisfaction and increased visits to the
physician after adjustment for coexisting morbidities. Visits to the
physician were up to three times more frequent among men with moderate
to severe sexual symptoms than among those with mild or no symptoms.
The researchers concluded that these symptoms deserve more attention in
the workup of aging male patients, because they offer a simple screening
tool to detect impaired well-being associated with increased consumption
of health services.32
Age management medicine incorporates well-known and accepted
markers of disease risk into proactive patient management and uses
hormone modulation for the endocrinologically “normal” by identifying
hormone levels, which yield superior health outcomes. For most
hormones, this is simply the upper 33% of the normal range for a
patient’s age. The exceptions are insulin and cortisol (which should be
modulated to the lower 33% of the normal range) and human growth
hormone, which is only prescribed to deficient adults.
Age management medicine recognizes that successful therapies
necessitate a healthy lifestyle, including optimal low-glycemic index
nutrition, appropriate nutrient supplementation and the absolute need
for physical exercise. This unique field of medicine focuses on the
synergy of these elements, which enhances vitality and extends our
health span. While we may or may not be able to increase longevity, we
are able to prevent premature disability and death while enjoying a
better quality of life.
We have the knowledge, technology and expertise to prevent or delay
degenerative disease as well as the signs and symptoms associated with
aging. The starting place, of course, is a comprehensive evaluation to
understand each patient’s unique needs. Today, each of us has the power
to improve the quality of our lives by focusing on improving our
health.
The American medical care system is based on the treatment of
disease—waiting for something negative to happen, and then trying to fix
it after the fact. Age management medicine takes a positive turn in
medical science, using a preventive, proactive approach to lengthen
health span and enjoy a more youthful aging process.
Slide01
What Causes Aging Symptoms?
Much of aging can be seen as deficiencies in many substances our
body once produced in abundance. Improper nutrition can exacerbate
problems consistent with aging. Two key factors make it extremely
difficult for anyone to obtain all the micro and macronutrients,
vitamins and minerals essential for good health—despite American
awareness about the need to improve nutrition: (A) the soil where our
food grows and animals graze is depleted severely, lacking essential
nutrients; (B) the foods we actually eat are generally highly processed.
Finally, increased risk of injury and day-to-day aches and pains are
more prevalent in the many middle-aged and senior individuals who don’t
participate in effective, regular, physical activity.
Until relatively recently, the best that was offered for living a
healthy life were good nutrition and exercise—both well-accepted
measures for good health. For over 60 years mothers have supplemented
their children’s diets with vitamins and minerals…whatever the doctor
ordered. The plethora of health food stores, nutraceutical houses,
fitness studios and gyms is evidence that thethe public is aware that
nutrition and exercise are beneficial. But it hasn’t been enough.1
Slide02
Most medical researchers agree there is a 2% to 3% decline in many
hormones, beginning at age 30. These deficiencies contribute to a
decline in energy levels as well as muscle and bone strength. Additional
age markers include diminution of sensory, cognitive, motor and
pulmonary functions; loss of skin elasticity; increased fat-to-muscle
ratio; onset of osteoporosis; diminished libido; and erratic male
erectile function. The entire endocrine system participates in the aging
process. The master hormone (pituitary growth hormone) plays a pivotal
role—but diminishes with age. (There are criteria for adult onset growth
hormone deficiency, which must be met before therapy is instituted.)
Thyroid hormone plays a powerful role in metabolic regulation; low
levels contribute to weight gain, depression and fatigue. Testosterone,
estrogen, progesterone, etc. also play significant roles. Less than
optimal levels of important nutrients play a large role as well. While
genetic programming does many wonderful things, nature’s plan brings us
to the age of reproduction and nurturing . . . and then seems to have
little use for us. At that point, we begin to fail.
Slide03
We really don’t die of old age: We die of degenerative diseases.
Slide04
Of
these, heart disease, cancer, stroke and diabetes all have to do with
obesity and lifestyle. A meta-analysis conducted in 2008 and published
in 2009 looked at the mortality effects of 12 modifiable
dietary, lifestyle, and
metabolic risk factors in the United States (US) using consistent and
comparable methods: high blood glucose, low-density lipoprotein (LDL)
cholesterol, and blood pressure; overweight–obesity; high dietary trans
fatty acids and salt; low dietary polyunsaturated fatty acids, omega-3
fatty acids (seafood), and fruits and vegetables; physical inactivity;
alcohol use; and tobacco smoking.
Danaei, et al (2009) conducted a metaanalysis on risk factor exposures
in the US population. They derived their data from nationally
representative health surveys and disease-specific mortality statistics
from the National Center for Health Statistics. They obtained the
etiological effects of risk factors on disease-specific mortality, by
age, from systematic reviews and meta-analyses of epidemiological
studies that had adjusted (i) for major potential confounders, and (ii)
where possible for regression dilution bias. They estimated the number
of disease-specific deaths attributable to all non-optimal levels of
each risk factor exposure, by age and sex. In 2005, tobacco smoking and
high blood pressure were responsible for an estimated 467,000 and
395,000 deaths, accounting for about one in five or six deaths in US
adults. Overweight–obesity (216,000) and physical inactivity (191,000)
were each responsible for nearly 1 in 10 deaths. High dietary salt
(102,000), low dietary omega-3 fatty acids (84,000), and high dietary
trans fatty acids (82,000) were the dietary risks with the largest
mortality effects. Although 26,000 deaths from ischemic heart disease,
ischemic stroke, and diabetes were averted by current alcohol use, they
were outweighed by 90,000 deaths from other cardiovascular diseases,
cancers, liver cirrhosis, pancreatitis, alcohol use disorders, road
traffic and other injuries, and violence.
Slide05
The authors concluded that smoking and high blood pressure, which both
have effective interventions, are responsible for the largest number of
deaths in the US. Other dietary, lifestyle, and metabolic risk factors
for chronic diseases also cause a substantial number of deaths in the
US.45
In age management medicine, the goals are to enhance vitality,
vigor and health through nutrition, supplementation, exercise and
hormone optimization. The Canadian Study of Health and Aging (CSHA), in
2008, investigated how exercise is associated with cognitive change and
mortality in older people and, particularly, whether exercise might
paradoxically increase the risk of dementia by allowing people to live
longer. They found that exercise is strongly associated with improving
cognition. As the majority of mortality benefit of exercise is at the
highest level of cognition, and declines as cognition declines, the net
effect of exercise should be to improve cognition at the population
level, even with more people living longer.31
Depression
is highly prevalent among elderly individuals, with a reported
prevalence in the community
of 1.8% for major depression, 9.8% for minor depression, and 13.5% for
clinically relevant depressive symptoms (CRDSs). Although
cross-sectional studies have shown depression to be associated with poor
health, functional impairment, decreased quality of life, and greater
use of health services, prospective studies have shown depression and
depressive symptoms to be
independent determinants of mortality. (41)
Slide06
depicts a
curve of the average American with age on the X-axis; quality of life
and health are on the Y-axis. At about age 40-45, our quality of life
and health peak out. From that point out, they slowly decline until we
die. Age management medicine is all about “squaring” that curve, so our
quality of life and health remain optimal—until just before we die.
There are obvious benefits to this, but there also is a hidden one.
Medical breakthroughs will continue, potentially resulting in increased
longevity. The question is, will we able to take advantage of them?
That depends on where we are on the curve. If we’re on the extreme,
declining line of the curve prior to entering a nursing home, we won’t
be physically able to take advantage of these breakthroughs, nor would
we want to. However, if we remain on the stable part of the curve,
enjoying great health and better quality of life, then we would be
physically able to take advantage of the medical breakthroughs . . . and
would welcome the opportunity to add another 10 or 15 years to our
lives.
Slide07
Traditional
medicine continues to be excellent at serving the needs of the very
sick, injured and dying—what is generally referred to as “acute”
illness. Far too often, a large percentage of a patient’s medical costs
are spent during the last few years of life. The money is spent with the
frequent recognition that it is futile, since extraordinary measures may
not increase the life span with any significant quality. It would make
more sense to invest in preventing illness early on, so middle and older
years can be vigorous and productive. That is the mindset of those
investing in the programs, products and protocols of age management
medicine.
Using the narrowest of meanings, health has traditionally been
defined as “the absence of disease.” Yet, historically, Western
medicine has conditioned people to wait until the onset of “symptoms”
before taking concrete steps to correct what may have been wearing down
silently for years. Age management practitioners—pioneers in 21st-century
medicine—view health as a lot more than simply “not being sick.” Health
is a positive state . . . an optimal state . . . a state where all
faculties and senses are fully alive, functioning at their peak in top
running order. By this new and better definition, health means much more
than just the absence of symptoms. It means the mind is sharp and
focused; energy and enthusiasm is boundless; the body is in peak
condition. Individuals can experience life fully and gloriously with
passion and enthusiasm.8
The Emerging Field of “Anti-Aging” Medicine
Until slightly over a decade ago, there was no medical specialty to
deal with slowing down and reversing many of the signs of aging—from the
inside out. While human Growth Hormone (hGH) had been used for over 50
years in the treatment of hormone deficient children, the New England
Journal of Medicine published a groundbreaking clinical study on
July 5, 1990, by Daniel Rudman, MD. The study involving 12 sedentary men
(ages 61 to 81) demonstrated that human Growth Hormone (hGH)
supplementation for mature, sedentary adults—even without lifestyle
changes—could result in improved health and potentially reverse the
signs and symptoms of aging . . . but, of course, not aging itself.
2 Follow-up studies led Rudman and other pioneers in the field to
conclude that physical deterioration associated with aging is not
inevitable and that “some aspects of [the aging process] can be
prevented or reversed.”3 We are in the early stages of
understanding the benefits of endocrine balance and the possible role of
growth hormone supplementation in adult onset deficiency. Although we
cannot yet affect aging at the cellular level, the possibility of a
higher-quality life—available through our improving the signs and
symptoms of aging—is now upon us.4
One of the major issues often brought up by critics of hormone
optimization is that while it might work in patients who are truly
hypogonadal and/or AGHD by traditional definitions, it does not apply to
those who are eugonadal or have low but normal IGF-1. So it's
interesting that some researchers recently (2009) looked at 120
community dwelling men, average age 71yo w/BMI 27+.
The inclusion criteria were interesting in that rather than exclude
those with TT in the "normal" reference range, they actively sought out
those with morning TT in the lower half, eg 150-550ng/dL (their
definition). Average TT ended up between 311-377ng/dL. Really
intriguing was that they also sought out those with IGF-1 in the lower
tertile for adults, eg <167ng/mL, rather than limit the study to those
w/AGHD who failed stimulation tests. Average IGF-1 ranged 105-127ng/mL
This is our patient population.
The authors used 1% transdermal testosterone, offering 5g or 10g QAM x
16wks in order to achieve either the low normal range typical of older
men or mid-to-high normal range typical of younger men. Placebo
injections or hGH was given as either 3ug/kg nightly or 5ug/kg nightly.
The lower was picked because 2ug/kg had NOT been shown to increase
whole-body protein synthesis in AGHD but 3.3ug/kg had. 5ug/kg dose was
chosen to offer even greater anabolic stimulus with minimal risk of side
effects from even higher doses.
As a result of the above interventions, TT increased by 143+/-379ng/dl
in those receiving 5g/d while it increased by 510+/-503ng/dL in those
receiving 10g/d. Those who received 3ug/kg/d saw their IGF-1 increase
by 64+/-44ng/dL while those who received 5ug/kg/d increased by
108+/-51ng/dl. Those who received testosterone cream plus placebo saw a
statistically significant increase in IGF-1 of 14+/-28ng/dL.
Most importantly, at the end of just four months, the authors noted
significant increases in whole-body and limb skeletal muscle mass,
reduction in whole-body and trunk fat, and overall improvement in
strength and even physical performance as measured by VO2max. Better
results were found in those who received hGH on top of testosterone
cream and in those who received 10g/d compared to those who only
received 5g/d.
HDL did increase by 3.5md/dL but so did TC & LDL while TG dropped by
18mg/dL. Fasting glucose increased by 3mg/dL. Average PSA increased
from 1.5ng/mL to 1.7ng/mL over the course of four weeks so this would
bear watching closely. Hct also increased from 43.2% to 45.2%. While
most of these changes were statistically significant, one would not
consider them clinically significant. However, most concerning was an
increase in BP by 12/8mm Hg, bringing the subjects from truly optimal to
pre-hypertensive. So BP needs to be monitored closely.43
Slide08
The most important element necessary for the success of any medical
therapy is the expertise and experience of the physicians, entrusted
with patients’ healthcare. Physicians can now be certified in age
management medicine after completing a rigorous program in hormone
modulation therapies, nutritional strategies and exercise science.
Hormone modulation is the science of optimizing hormones that are
no longer adequately produced by the body. The objectives of hormone
modulation are to bring the patient’s hormone levels back to those of
their mid-30s, when the immune system was the strongest, metabolism was
the most efficient and ability to build muscle rather than fat was the
greatest. Achieving and maintaining the newly re-optimized state of
health is accomplished through highly individualized programs, taking
into account the patient’s lifestyle, medical history, emotional
stresses and personal goals.
Traditional medical practices follow a fix-it-when-it-breaks or
diagnose-and-treat approach. Age management medicine emphasizes the
enhancement of health over the treatment of illness. It is focused on
prevention and wellness, resulting in a more dynamic life throughout
middle age and beyond. This can be accomplished through the synergy of
hormone modulation, nutrition with appropriate supplementation and
physical activity. Once understood by both physician and patient, this
synergistic approach must be implemented with the patient in a
partnering way to assure compliance. The result is optimal health and
longevity.
The healthy 30-year-old individual is the model to emulate
physiologically and biochemically since this is the age (on average)
where “all systems are go.”
Oxidative Stress & Aging
Here in the 21st century, more advanced medical studies are
bearing out the validity of a 50-year-old idea, regarding the important
relationship between aging and “oxidative stress.” The first cellular
theories of aging and oxidative stress were developed in the early
1950s, with the discovery of oxygen free radicals and their association
with the age-related accumulation of oxidative damage to cells. It was
found that as a normal part of human physiology, our bodies routinely
split oxygen molecules in order to carry out metabolic tasks: You may
recall that we call everyday oxygen “O2” – signifying two
oxygen atoms bound together, sharing a common electron. When these two
atoms go their separate ways, one of the oxygen atoms gets sole custody
of the formerly shared electron; the other gets none. The atom without
the electron is chemically unstable and called “oxygen free-radical.”
This free radical has a potent attractive force for pulling a
replacement electron away from surrounding tissue. When this tissue is
forced to give up an electron to the free radical, it becomes oxidized.
Oxidation damages tissue, so the tissue must either be repaired,
continue to soldier on damaged with diminished functional capabilities
or die. The initial research studies revealed evidence of oxidative
damage invariably accumulates with age, with the body’s repair rate
never quite keeping pace with the damage rate. These results heralded
the beginnings of current scientific reasoning, regarding the importance
of preventing oxidative damage and the crucial role, played by
antioxidant compounds.
Aging and related diseases are accompanied by increased Oxidative Stress
(OS) and accumulation of Advanced Glycation End products (AGEs). One
important component of AGEs accumulation with aging appears to be the
sustained exposure to dietary AGE (dAGEs), which contributes to
overloading of anti-AGE receptors and depletion of antioxidant reserves.
support this postulation. Lowering the content of AGEs in the normal
diet significantly prevents AGEs accumulation and the increased OS
caused by aging and also extends lifespan in mice. In humans, short-term
trials indicate that a Low AGEs diet reduces oxidant burden and
inflammatory markers.38
The body’s antioxidants act to prevent oxidative damage to cells.
They are preferential oxidants, meaning they “take the bullet” on our
behalf and donate electrons to free radicals so our tissues don’t have
to. They become oxidized, rather than our tissues. Studies looking at
the healthiest members of older age groups reliably demonstrate that
these healthy subjects have higher levels of antioxidant compounds than
their less healthy counterparts. People who have “aged successfully”
have been found to have higher levels of antioxidants in their
circulation and cells. Their antioxidant levels actually are comparable
with the average levels of much younger subjects.
Other studies have shown that while antioxidants can mitigate the
progression of a given disease, their greatest power is in disease
prevention. People who have measurably higher antioxidant levels are at
reduced risk for Parkinson’s Disease; but if therapy is not undertaken
before the onset of this disease, later use of antioxidants has minimal
or no benefit. (9) Adequate antioxidant levels have been consistently
shown to prevent or lessen cognitive function declines. In fact, vitamin
E supplementation is now regarded as part of standard care for
Alzheimer’s.10
Oxidative stress has been implicated in sarcopenia and the loss of
muscle strength with aging, but the relationship between oxidative
stress and decrease in muscle strength and physical performance has not
been well characterized. Serum protein carbonyls are markers of
oxidative damage to proteins and are caused by oxidative stress. High
oxidative stress, as indicated by oxidative damage to proteins, is an
independent predictor of decrease in walking speed and progression to
severe walking disability among older women living in the community.39
Slide09
Most of the antioxidant vitamins have been shown to decrease
well-described and universally accepted markers of oxidative damage.
Medical literature has begun to suggest that different antioxidants have
specific organs that they benefit most. The cardiac and coronary artery
disease literature has shown the value of coenzyme Q-10. The neurology
literature has established vitamin E as a valuable contributor in the
care of Alzheimer’s patients.11 Also, vitamin E has been
shown to improve immune function, decrease oxidized LDL cholesterol (the
first step in coronary artery blockage), decrease markers of oxidative
damage to DNA (reducing cancer risk), improve glucose transport and
increase insulin sensitivity. Lycopene has shown to be useful for
optimum prostate health and may decrease prostate cancer risk. 12
Antioxidants can work together to maximize each other’s effect.
Coenzyme Q-10 can act as an “electron tanker” and recharge other
antioxidants. N-Acetyl-Cysteine is nature’s most potent vehicle for
generating the production of glutathione, perhaps the most important
antioxidant of all.
In the past, there was no readily available method to accurately
measure markers of oxidative damage or antioxidant levels. Now, some
specialized laboratories cannot only measure these factors, but also can
give us objective measures to use, specifically guiding an individual’s
supplementation regimen.
As these studies become more widely available, they can be used to
make recommendations, which are patient specific. Also, we will be able
to follow results over time to verify the effectiveness of a patient’s
program.
Markers of Oxidative Stress & Disease Risk
The following markers are useful for measuring the impact of
therapy and disease-risk alteration:
-
8-(F-2 alpha) Isoprostane: This molecule is a product of lipid
oxidation-and, most importantly, as the result of oxidizing
arachidonic acid. Isoprostane is able to adversely alter the
function of platelets and smooth muscle cells, lining arteries—and
has been established as a valid marker of oxidative stress. It is
found in higher levels in patients with diabetes, coronary artery
disease, Alzheimer’s and cirrhosis of the liver. Isoprostane levels
correlate with the degree of severity of these diseases as well.
-
8-OH-deoxyguanosine (8-OH-dg): When DNA undergoes oxidative damage,
it can repair itself to a great degree. Once repaired, pieces of
damaged DNA are snipped out (8-OH-dg) and replaced by new pieces. By
measuring how many snipped pieces are present, we can assess the
degree to which this oxidative DNA damage has occurred. The amount
of oxidative damage to DNA also correlates with a subject’s total
oxidative stress.
-
Myeloperoxidase
-
Nitrotyrosine
Inflammation
Slide10
The role of inflammation and chronic disease is familiar.
Inflammation is also a cause of aging. Let’s talk about the role of
inflammation in cardiovascular disease and other degenerative diseases.
The inflammatory response is part of our innate immunity. It occurs
when tissues are injured by bacteria, viruses, trauma, toxins, heat and
many other causes. In recent years, medical science has learned there
are low levels of chronic inflammation, occurring at the cellular
level. It is this kind of inflammation that is now linked to all of the
degenerative diseases. In fact, it is thought by many authorities that
low levels of chronic inflammation cause degenerative diseases. These
diseases would include Alzheimer’s, type 2 diabetes, hypertension,
cancer, stroke, heart disease, osteoporosis, accelerated aging, insulin
resistance, altered immune function, rheumatoid arthritis and sarcopenia.
Sarcopenia is the loss of muscle tissue and strength associated
with aging. It’s what causes frailty. Between the ages of 24 to 80, we
can experience as much as a 40% loss in muscle size and
strength—occurring at 1.4% per year and targeting mostly the fast-twitch
muscle fibers, although slow-twitch muscle fibers are targeted as well.
New research findings suggest inflammation may be an important cause of
sarcopenia, which results in significant disability as we age. There
are also higher rates of osteoporosis, insulin resistance, obesity, and
arthritis among those with sarcopenia.
How do we detect inflammation? There are several markers that can
be used for predicting inflammation, which would ultimately lead to
cardiovascular events—including Interleukin-6, aerum amyloid A, tumor
necrosis factor alpha, soluble intracellular adhesion molecules-1,
macrophage inhibitory cytokine-1, sP-Selectin, CD40 Ligand and hs-C-reactive
protein.
Definitions of Terms
·
Inflammation
- local response to cellular injury is marked by capillary dilatation,
leukocytic infiltration, redness, heat, pain, swelling and, often, loss
of function. It serves as a mechanism initiating the elimination of
noxious agents and of damaged tissue.
·
Cytokine - any
of a class of immunoregulatory proteins such as interleukins, tumor
necrosis factor, and interferon, secreted by cells, especially of the
immune system.
·
Chemokine
- any
group of chemotactic cytokines, produced by various cells. Inflammation
sites are thought to provide directional cues for white blood cell
movement, such as T-cells, monocytes and neutrophils.
·
Endothelium
- an epithelium of mesoblastic origin composed of a single layer of
thin, flattened cells, which line internal body cavities and blood
vessels.
Blood Cell Definitions
·
Leukocyte
– white
blood cells.
·
Monocyte – a
large white blood cell with finely granulated chromatin disbursed
throughout the nucleus. It is formed in the bone marrow, enters the
blood and migrates into the connective tissue, where it differentiates
into a macrophage.
·
Macrophage – a
phagocytic tissue cell, derived from a monocyte; protect the body
against infection and noxious substances.
·
Interleukin – any
of various compounds with low molecular weight, produced by lymphocytes,
macrophages and monocytes; regulates the immune system and cell-mediated
immunity.
·
Cytokines -
messengers of inflammation. A class of immunoregulatory proteins, such
as interleukins, tumor necrosis factor and interferon, secreted by cells
(especially immune system) that activate other nearby cells; promulgates
the inflammatory cascade. Interleukin-6 is a powerful pro-inflammatory
cytokine; it is the most important factor in controlling hepatic
acute–phase response. Total body adiposity is the single most important
determinant of serum interleukin-6 concentrations.(4)(5)
C-reactive Protein (CRP)
CRP is the ideal biomarker for inflammation. It is the one most
clinically useful, especially in detecting cardiovascular
inflammation. CRP screen now is recommended for patients at intermediate
cardiovascular disease risk—a 10%-20% risk over the next 10 years. It
is highly correlated with future risk of a cardiovascular event. The
highly sensitive C-reactive protein must be measured with levels less
than 1.0 desired. Levels between 1.0 and 3.0 are average risk; levels
greater than 3.0mg/L are high risk. It is important for patients to know
what their CRP levels are.
Patient factors associated with elevated CRP levels include . . .
-
Hypertension
-
Body mass index greater than 25
-
Metabolic syndrome
-
Hyperglycemia
-
Poor nutrition
-
Sedentary lifestyle
-
Dyslipidemia, which would include high triglycerides, low HDL and
high LDL
-
Chronic infection
-
Cigarette smoking, both active and passive
-
Excess alcohol intake
-
Poor dental hygiene
-
Rheumatoid arthritis
Patient factors decreasing CRP levels include
-
Alcohol consumption in moderation: no more than one drink per day
for a woman or two per day for a man. A drink is defined as five
ounces of wine, 1½ ounces of liquor or one 12-ounce beer.
-
Exercise and physical activity
-
Weight loss
-
Medications, including statins, niacin and fibrates
-
Omega-3 fatty acids
-
Dietary fiber
-
Right diet
Aging Skin
Skin represents a valuable model to study aging in humans, since it is
widely affected by this process and is easily accessible. Modifications
related to aging are particularly visible in human skin, which becomes
wrinkled, lax, dry, and irregularly pigmented over time5.
Aged skin is characterized by a flattening of the dermal-epidermal
junction, a marked atrophy and a loss of elasticity of the dermal
connective tissue6, associated with a reduction and
disorganization of its major extracellular matrix components, such as
collagen and other elastic fibers7, proteoglycans and
glycosaminoglycans8. A histological characteristic of
chronological aging in the epidermis is a decrease of tissue thickness7.
Solar radiations are particularly studied as environmental factors
promoting skin aging9 and carcinogenesis10. UV
lights have been shown to affect both epidermal keratinocytes11
and dermal fibroblasts12. However, at present, age-related
modifications of the different dermal fibroblast populations and the
consequent effects on skin aging remain poorly understood.
Characteristics of matched pairs of dermal papillary and reticular
fibroblasts (Fp and Fr) were investigated throughout aging, comparing
morphology, secretion of cytokines, MMPs/TIMPs, growth potential, and
interaction with epidermal keratinocytes. We observed that Fp
populations were characterized by a higher proportion of small cells
with low granularity and a higher growth potential than Fr populations.
However, these differences became less marked with increasing age of
donors. Aging was also associated with changes in the secretion activity
of both Fp and Fr. Using a reconstructed skin model, we evidenced that
Fp and Fr cells do not possess equivalent capacities to sustain
keratinopoiesis. Comparing Fp and Fr from young donors, we noticed that
dermal equivalents containing Fp were more potent to promote epidermal
morphogenesis than those containing Fr. These data emphasize the
complexity of dermal fibroblast biology and document the specific
functional properties of Fp and Fr. Our results suggest a new model of
skin aging in which marked alterations of Fp may affect the histological
characteristics of skin.
Memory
Stevens,
et al (Nov. 2008) published a meta-analysis of memory failure in older
adults. Their results provide new insight into the nature of
age-related memory decline, suggesting that at least two distinct
neurocognitive mechanisms play a role in encoding failures in older
adults:
1. a general failure to engage brain regions crucial to encoding new
information, such as MTL structures, can contribute to failed encoding
regardless of age.
2. Older, but not younger, adults are vulnerable to distraction due to
an inability to suppress processing of irrelevant environmental stimuli.
This distraction is reflected in age differences in those brain areas
that process the irrelevant stimuli, such as auditory stimuli during a
visual task (i.e., auditory cortices), as well as in DMRs (e.g., medial
parietal cortex) that may be involved in environmental monitoring.
In addition, these results support previous research showing that while
both younger and older adults’ performance was decreased on a long-term
recognition task following encoding inside, relative to outside, the
fMRI scanner, the deleterious effects of fMRI on performance were
greater for older adults (Gutchess and Park, 2006). This raises the
possibility that the distracting properties of fMRI scanning per se may
be disproportionately detrimental to older adults, relative to younger
adults, a potential confound that may have implications for fMRI
investigations of neurocognitive aging.35
Brain Aging
Normal brain aging can be defined as a normal biologic process of the
elderly characterized by
relative cerebral atrophy without severe compromising of normal
cognitive and motor performances. The aging brain shows volumetric
decrease, usually associated with diffuse or focal white-matter signal
abnormalities. A clear clinical or pathologic cut-off between
physiologic and abnormal aging in the brain does not exist, however.
36
Brain weight declines on average by about 2 to 3% per decade after age
50, accelerating in later years, so that beyond age 80, it is typically
decreased by 10% compared with the brains of young adults at
postmortem. In a cross-sectional study, the rate of shrinkage of total
brain volume was calculated to be about 0.32% per year over adult life
span, whereas temporal lobe atrophy averaged 0.68% and hippocampal
atrophy 0.82% annually. Other intrinsic (programmed) changes are the
Hayflick phenomenon (decreasing ability of the cells to divide),
telomere shortening, decreased neurogenesis (exhaustion of neural stem
cells), decline of growth factors (brain-derived neurotrophic factor,
nerve growth factor, TrkA receptor), and apoptosis.37
Sleep
Sleep
propensity and skin temperature are functionally related. In young
adults, changes of skin temperature within the comfortable thermoneutral
zone affect sleep-onset latency and vigilance performance. Aging is
associated with both decreased thermosensitivity and poorer sleep. A
study of sleep patterns and the elderly was conducted in the
Netherlands. The goal was to test whether subtle manipulations of core
body and skin temperature affect sleep onset in elderly people without
sleep complaints and in elderly insomniacs and whether the subjective
perception of these mild body temperature manipulations is preserved
with aging and insomnia. They found that warming the proximal skin by
0.4˚C facilitates sleep onset equally effective in healthy elderly (by
18% ie, by 1.84 minutes and elderly insomniacs (28%, 2.85 minutes).
These effects were comparable to the results in healthy young subjects,
in spite of a marked decrease in the subjective perception of
temperature changes in elderly subjects, especially in insomniacs. The
researchers concluded that the findings show that mild changes in skin
temperature have an effect on sleep propensity in elderly and indicate
that elderly insomniacs may have a diminished capability to recognize
that a slight increase in bed temperature facilitates the initiation or
re-initiation of sleep.40
Cardiovascular Disease
Approximately 61.8 million Americans have cardiovascular disease.
Of these, 13 million have coronary artery disease, resulting in 2,000
deaths in the nation daily. Cardiovascular disease claims more lives
each year than the next five leading causes of death combined. Reports
show 1 in 2.4 women die from cardiovascular disease, compared to 1 in 29
from breast cancer. If we could eliminate all major forms of
cardiovascular disease, we could add 7 years to everyone’s life
expectancy. The cost of cardiovascular disease and stroke in the U.S.
during 2003 was $351.8 billion. Approximately 105 million American
adults have a blood cholesterol level equal to or greater than 200mg/dl.32
Clearly, as Galen said, “Prevention is better than cure.”
Lipids & Cardiovascular Disease
LDL cholesterol—the first
category of lipids, which also is a major cholesterol carrier in blood. LDL
promotes atherosclerosis and is influenced by genetics, high-saturated
fatty acid diets and inactivity. Secondary causes include diabetes,
hypothyroidism, obstructive liver disease, chronic renal failure and
certain drugs.
HDL cholesterol—a lipid
carrying cholesterol away from the arteries. It may remove excess
cholesterol from atherosclerotic plaque. HDL has antioxidant and
anti-inflammatory properties. It is influenced by genetics, insulin
resistance, high triglyceride levels, overweight and obesity,
inactivity, cigarette smoking, high carbohydrate diets and certain
drugs, like beta-blockers, anabolic steroids and progestational agents.
Triglycerides—the next category of
lipids, obtained from the blood and also made by the liver. It’s
transported through the blood on either chylomicrons or VLDL. Triglycerides
are influenced by obesity, insulin resistance, inactivity, smoking, high
carbohydrate diets, diseases (such as Type 2 diabetes), chronic renal
failure and nephrotic syndrome, excess alcohol, drugs (including
corticosteroids, oral estrogen, retinoids) and genetics.
LDL is the primary atherogenic factor. Trial after trial has
shown that lowering LDL reduces cardiac events. Low HDL remains an
important independent risk factor for cardiac events. The Air
Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study showed that
aggressive statin therapy is an appropriate treatment for low HDL
syndrome. Triglycerides are probably a secondary risk factor in
coronary artery disease.15
The “Big Four” low-LDL trials:
1.
Heart Protection Trial from Great Britain published in Lancet
in 2002.16
2.
Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy-Thrombolysis
in MI.22 (PROVE IT) Trial, published in the New England
Journal of Medicine in 2004.17
3.
“A to Z” Trial. Published in JAMA in 2004.18
4.
“Treating to New Targets,” published in the New England Journal
of Medicine in 2005.19
The bottom line to all these trials is that LDL should be lowered
to less than 70 in all patients with recent or remote coronary artery
disease. Dr. Robert Guthrie, an authority in the matter, states, “If
these guidelines are ignored, a physician is very vulnerable to legal
action.” 18 Ultra-low LDL should also be a goal for all
diabetic and metabolic syndrome patients.
Metabolic Syndrome
A growing but conflicting body of literature suggests that the metabolic
syndrome may be associated with cognitive impairment. A study,
published in March, 2009, was conducted at 180 clinical centers in 25
countries. A total of 497 women (10.2%) had the metabolic syndrome, and
of these, 36 (7.2%) developed cognitive impairment compared with 181
women (of 4398, 4.1%) without the syndrome. The mean (SD) number of
metabolic syndrome components for all women was 1.0; 518 women (10.6%)
were obese, 895 (18.3%) had hypertriglyceridemia, 1200 (24.5%) had low
high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, 1944 (39.7%) had high blood
pressure, and 381 (7.8%) had high fasting blood glucose levels. There
was a 23.0% age-adjusted increase in the risk of developing cognitive
impairment per unit increase in the number of components. Further
multivariable adjustment somewhat reduced the effect. The researchers
concluded that there was an association between the metabolic syndrome
and the number of components and risk of developing cognitive impairment
in older women. Additional studies are needed to determine if screening
and close management of these at-risk elderly women would diminish the
incidence of cognitive impairment.33 Slide11
Hyperhomocysteinemia
Homocysteine is a substance produced, when the body breaks down the
amino acid methionine. High levels of homocysteine are inflammatory and
injure arterial endothelial cells, which promote proliferation of
arterial smooth muscle cells, vascular inflammation, atherogenesis and
destabilization of established plaque.21 Deficiencies of
folic acid, vitamin B-6 and B-12 are associated with
hyperhomocysteinemia. An investigation is underway, determining whether
vitamins correct elevated homocysteine levels and reduce vascular
events. In 1999, the American Heart Association recommended that all
patients with a family history of cardiovascular disease should exceed
the recommended dietary allowance values for folic acid, vitamin B-6 and
vitamin B-12.22
A few comments need to be made about homocysteine levels and sample
handling. Homocysteine is released from cells in whole blood, left at
room temperature. A rapid separation of plasma homocysteine is required
for testing reliability. The plasma should be immediately cooled on ice,
then frozen below -20°C until time of analysis.23 At this
point in time, there is no consensus on homocysteine management with
regard to B vitamin supplementation for treating hyperhomocysteinemia.
Baseline serum levels of B-12 should be checked prior to supplementation
to avoid masking a B-12 deficiency. Dosages of B-6 greater than
500mg/day are not recommended and may cause irreversible nerve damage.24
Patient Evaluation
Every patient must begin with an appropriate, thorough and
uncompromising evaluation—including the following laboratory
analysis—before any hormonal intervention is contemplated.
Slide12
To provide sufficient time for processing, it is suggested that
labs be performed prior to the patient’s visit. The patient’s in-office
visit should be scheduled no sooner than two weeks out, allowing
adequate time for the results. Immediately upon scheduling the
appointment, a medical history and lifestyle questionnaire is expedited
(overnight to the patient), allowing adequate time to thoughtfully
complete the form and return it back to the physician. This allows the
physician to correlate the laboratory finding with the history prior to
the patient’s visit, maximizing the quality of time spent with the
doctor. Ideally, the actual patient appointment at a state-of-the art
age management center should be a full-day visit, which includes
additional biological testing, a complete physical examination,
nutritional consultation, exercise program discussion and design as well
as the consultation with the doctor, which may last for two hours or
more.
This full day of diagnostics and consultations, combined with the
information analyzed from the lab results and the medical history,
allows the age management healthcare team (physician, nutritionist and
exercise physiologist) to thoroughly assess the general health, as well
as the hormonal and nutritional needs of the patient. The team is then
able to recommend suitable program options for the patient’s
consideration.
It is interesting to note (and, perhaps, reflective of our current
medical scene) that 10% of the patients experiencing the comprehensive
diagnostic evaluation described above were found to have a significant
medical problem, which had been missed by their regular physician.
When such patients are seen, the responsible age management
physician generally sends them back to their primary physicians for
work-up and care. Many of those patients return to the age management
physician later for appropriate program implementation. It is important
to note that qualified age management physicians are not interested in
taking over as the patient’s primary physician. On the contrary, and
with the patient’s consent, the age management healthcare team wishes to
keep the patient’s primary physician fully informed of diagnoses and
instituted protocols. Such cooperation is for the patient’s welfare, but
often becomes an educational process for the primary physician, who
observes how the patient’s general health improves.
Some general indicators of physical condition also serve as
possibly significant indicators for additional therapy, including
greater emphasis on dietary and specific nutraceutical supplementation:
strength, flexibility, agility and other biomarkers of aging, such as
bone density, percentage of lean body mass and percentage of body fat
(measured by body region and total body). Additional biomarkers are
assessed for mental function (cognition and memory). Included are
cognitive testing for the earliest possible detection of any form of
dementia and high-performance cardiac stress testing with pulmonary
function.
Many physicians are incorporating age management medicine into
their current specialty. By affiliating and working with a qualified age
management center, the individual physician is developing a quality age
management component in his/her practice. Such physician partnering is
an excellent way for a physician to build up the age management
component—without major investments in diagnostic equipment and with the
full support of experienced age management medicine practitioners.
Risk Modeling
Over the last two decades, the medical community has embraced
medical risk statistics and the imperative for early interventions.
Classically, physicians have been taught only to consider markers of
disease states, which correlate with the presence of significant
preexisting clinical pathology - diagnosis. The concept of disease risk
markers in patients who do not yet manifest a given disease is
relatively new in medical history, approaching only 40 years of clinical
use.
Although the treatment of hypertension is now widely understood as
an important intervention based on hypertensive outcomes, rather than
hypertensive symptoms, the clinical utility of managing blood pressure
was not widely accepted until the 1960s. Outcome studies uniformly
acknowledge the validity of intervention in this regard—but it was a
point of dispute in most of our patients’ lifetimes, rather than the
self-evident truth it has become.
Modern medicine has become comfortable with risk modeling. We
accept the fact that 90% of American subjects who are normotensive at
age 55 will eventually become hypertensive, according to the Seventh
Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection,
Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC7).24 The
blood pressure diagnosis and treatment values set forth by the JNC7 are
the current standard of care. Hypertension is defined as systolic blood
pressure (BP) equal to or greater than 140mm Hg or diastolic BP equal to
or greater than 90mm Hg. Strong data correlate blood pressure in this
range with risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD); intervention is
associated with improved outcomes. Prehypertension is a pathological
state associated with future CVD risk, requiring intervention as well.
Prehypertension is defined as a systolic BP between 120 and 139mm HG or
diastolic BP between 80 and 89mm HG. 24
This standard of care demonstrates an important point, beyond its
use as an interventional guideline. According to the WHO MONICA Project,
published in 1998, the average systolic BP for Americans is 124mm Hg,
with a standard deviation value of 16mm Hg. According to population
data, people with a systolic BPs who are actually below the mean are
considered prehypertensive by the JNC7 protocol. BP values from 96% of
the mean to 1 standard deviation above the mean qualify as having higher
than acceptable risk. Hypertension is defined as starting 1 SD above the
mean. To satisfy the classic medical approach for identifying pathology,
systolic BP must be 156mm Hg and above before that value is considered
abnormal.25
For diastolic blood pressure, similar data hold true. Campbell, in
the British Medical Journal (1997), evaluated diastolic BP (DBP)
statistics and found the mean for DBP values was 82.5mm Hg with an SD of
10mm Hg. According to JNC7 criteria, average DBP is prehypertensive;
less than one SD separates low-risk values from hypertension. Again, the
standard 2 SD model would require a DBP of 102.5mm Hg or above to
satisfy diagnostic criteria. 24 Slide13
Risk assessment and intervention have morphed with relative risk
now being as routine and accepted a consideration as any other
diagnostic modality in the medical setting.
Like blood pressure measurement, the same trend has held true for
interpretation of lipid levels and other asymptomatic markers of future
risk. Progress in identifying and altering markers of disease risk as
they relate to patient outcomes has been steady and rewarding.
This transformation from diagnosing disease to assessing risk has
had a profound effect on the statistics of what is defined as a healthy
vs. potentially unhealthy laboratory value and has shaped the way we
decide when intervention should take place.
Glucose & Insulin Metabolism Measurements
During the last 50 years there has been a marked increase in the
number of persons in the United States who have diabetes. In 1958 fewer
than two million in the United States were diabetic, whereas today the
number approaches 16 million. There has been a similar increase in
diabetes throughout the world, with alarming recent increases in
diabetes in developing nations as well as in the developed.
Diabetes mellitus is a disease of older persons: more than half of all
diabetics in the United States are over 60 years of age. The prevalence
of diabetes mellitus peaks in persons between 65 to 74 years of age.
Twenty percent of men and more than 15% of women 65 to 74 years of age
have diabetes. There is a decrease in prevalence rates in persons 75
years and older. It is important to recognize that in 25% to 41% of
persons who have diabetes the diagnosis has not been made. Diabetes
mellitus is more common in Hispanics (especially those from Mexico).
At a basic level, diabetes mellitus accelerates the aging process.
Diabetes is associated with a decrease in DNA unwinding rate, increased
collagen cross-linking, increased capillary basement membrane
thickening, increased oxidative damage, and decreased NaþKþATPase
activity. These basic changes result in increased clinical signs of
aging. Cataracts
occur 2.5 times more commonly in diabetics than in nondiabetics.
Diabetics have accelerated atherosclerosis with increased propensity to
have a myocardial infarction, stroke, and peripheral vascular disease.42
Slide14
In this age of epidemic diabetes, the use of glucose measurement as a
marker of disease risk is well established in the medical literature,
but there is utility in this measure beyond the standard categorization
of a value as “normal” or “abnormal.”
An aside: Clinicians often exhibit traits that are all too human in
our interpretation of these values. We were taught implicitly in medical
school to peruse a laboratory report and quickly scan past any values
not conveniently marked with an “H” or an “L”—hopefully in a contrasting
color that stands out nicely on a printed page or cathode ray tube. This
made for fast and directed medical decision making, which may have been
useful in the emergency at 3 am, but do not fully serve our patients’
interest in a longitudinal care setting.
With regard to “normal” glucose and health risk, even values within
the “normal” range associated with risk stratification in the same way
cholesterol values are.
Hoogwerf, in the 2002 American Journal of Cardiology,
reported on the coronary artery disease risk (CAD), associated with
glucose values of 125mg/dl and below.26
Slide15
The study followed 2,440 non-diabetic subjects for a five-year
period. People with fasting glucose levels of greater than 100, but less
than 125mg/dl were found to have nearly triple the risk for CAD as those
subjects with fasting glucose levels of less than 86mg/dl. For each
quintile within the normal range that glucose was reduced, there was a
demonstrable and significant reduction in disease risk. These findings
remained significant down to glucose levels below 86mg/dl before the
risk curve flattened out and no further advantage was demonstrated.
The findings were consistent through all accompanying adjustments
for other cardiac risk factors. The table demonstrates the odds ratios
for CAD for unadjusted glucose values and after adjustment for
Framingham risk score, body mass index, homocysteine and ferritin.
Glucose values are independent variables of CAD risk.
Interestingly, in the short time since publication, laboratory
reference ranges (based partly on these findings) have been established
placing the upper limit of normal at 100mg/dl. This study readily
demonstrates the “trouble with normal” when trying to place our patients
in categories of lowest disease risk.
Similar risk associations have been demonstrated with hemoglobinA1C
(HBA1C). Adler, in the 2000 British Medical Journal, discussed
an 8.5-year study on 3,642 subjects with a history of NIDDM Type II. The
study demonstrated CAD risk in association with HBA1C values, with the
lowest risk category being HBA1C values of 5.1% or below, even though
standard lab references identify HBA1C values of 6.0% or below as being
“normal.” 27
Slide16
Lastly, fasting insulin levels have been correlated with CAD risk,
as well. Haffner, in the 2002 American Journal of Cardiology,
reviewed findings from the Helsinki Heart Study, showing the association
between fasting insulin levels and CAD risk in non-diabetic men. Over a
25-year follow-up period, subjects in the lowest quintile for fasting
insulin levels demonstrated one-third the CAD risk as those in the
highest quintile. The target level for fasting insulin in patients
correlates with the lowest risk group in this large population based
study. The graph below demonstrates insulin quintile risk within “normal
range.” 28
Slide17
Lipid Markers
As mentioned in the introduction, lipid metabolism markers are
well-established in the disease risk literature. The age management
goals for lipid modulation are the achievement of lipid values, which
place each measurement in the lowest category of risk for each marker.
For LDL, this value is less than 100mg/dl; for coronary risk ratio, this
value is less than 4.0 for men and less than 3.5 for women; for
triglycerides, the value is less than double HDL or less than 100,
whichever is lower; for Lp (a), the value is less than 10.28
For
optimal ranges for women, see
Slide18
Slide19
For
optimal ranges for men, see
Slide20
Slide21
The Age Management Medicine Patient Program
Naturally, the patient programs are dependent upon individual needs
and goals. The following is a brief overview of the treatment program.
The most comprehensive program should be a combination of optimal
diet (including supplementation), ongoing exercise (both aerobic and
weight bearing) and hormone modulation, when indicated. Each of these
components offers something positive to the patient, yet the combination
of the three is greater than each part. Each synergizes the others to
become more effective than if it was the sole program for the patient.
Nutrition
While this may be overly simplifying the issue, sound nutritional
advice can be generally condensed as this:
1.
Natural foods only—if God didn’t make it, don't eat it.
2.
Moderate protein
3.
Healthy natural fats, preferentially mono-unsaturated, like virgin
olive oil. No artificial or hydrogenated fats.
4.
The only carbohydrates should be fruits and vegetables, no bread,
pasta, rice, wheat of any kind.
5.
“Cheat” only if you must, but keep it to less than 10% of your
dietary intake.
This is a low-glycemic philosophy. It is extremely healthy and
reduces the need for insulin, reaping all the resulting benefits.
Suffice to
say, our American diet is terrible. Since the introduction of “diet”
foods, our nation has become a society where obesity has risen steadily.
Author Deborah Shelton quotes the following statistics in an abstract of
the November 8, 1999 issue of the American Medical News, "Most
Patients Don't See Excess Weight as Health Danger":
-
85% of overweight adults who tried to lose weight, attempted it
without consulting a doctor
-
55% of overweight and obese adults had not discussed weight loss
with a primary care provider
-
63% of those who talked to a doctor about weight loss said they
initiated the discussion.29
The statistics were a result of a survey, commissioned by Shape Up
America!—a nonprofit organization founded by former U.S. Surgeon General
C. Everett Koop, MD. The survey concluded most overweight Americans are
in a state of denial, and the medical community has been lax in
communicating the health dangers of obesity to society in general. The
American Obesity Association has placed obesity as the second leading
cause of preventable death; U.S. government estimates that 25% of
children, 35% of women and 31% of men in this country have a body mass
index approaching obesity. Nonetheless, most people are oblivious to the
severe health consequences of being overweight.
More surprising is the survey’s conclusion that the medical
community not only neglects to bring up the subject of a patient’s
weight, but often fails to educate the patient about treatment, such as
behavior modification, exercise, diet and effective medication. Weight
control is imperative in an effective program, focused on optimal health
and longevity.
The prevalence of overweight and obesity is higher in the US than
in Japan, as is the prevalence of heart disease, diabetes, arthritis,
and functioning problems. Researchers looked at the data from many
studies conducted in the US and Japan to try to determine if the
differences in health status are due to differences in rates of
obesity. They found that education level and marital status are
predictors of overweight for older Americans but not for older Japanese
people. Health behaviors affect weight in all groups. The prevalence of
functioning problems and disease are more likely to be associated with
being overweight in US men and women than in Japanese women, and are not
associated with being overweight in Japanese men.(34)
The topic of nutritional supplementation is much more complex and
lengthy and, perhaps, the subject of another course. But with a food
supply now depleted of sufficient nutrients, a plethora of processed
food and faulty governmental nutritional guidelines, it is easy to see
the need for nutraceuticals. The multimillion-dollar nutraceutical
industry evidences the public’s awareness of their need to supplement
dietary intake with vitamins and minerals. Here again, however, the
public is uneducated as to what nutritional supplements are needed, what
the difference is between food grade and pharmacy grade, how
bioavailable their nutritional supplements are and if their current
nutritional supplements are actually being absorbed. Most people on a
comprehensive formulation do not need additional supplementation;
however, if lab results indicate supplementation is required, then
individual needs should be pinpointed and additional nutrients made
available. Nutritional supplementation can also address unique needs,
such as joint pain relief, desire for brain enhancement, help to reverse
adult onset diabetes, etc. Qualified age management practices provide
patients with the specific nutraceuticals those needs demand.
Hormone Modulation
The preferable term is now hormone “modulation,” rather than
hormone “replacement,” because we never want to shut down a patient’s
own output. Therefore, we supplement when needed per a comprehensive
evaluation process. We monitor the stimulating hormones whenever
possible to be certain we don't shut off the body's own biofeedback
mechanisms. (Shutting off the body’s own biofeedback mechanism is our
definition of abuse and is to be avoided at all costs.) Not all
hormones need to be supplemented. Sometimes we need to reduce the body’s
own output of hormones, such as insulin or cortisol.
Like a fine-tuned symphony orchestra, where the music sounds best
when the instruments play together at the appropriate sound level and
timing, modulating the body’s hormones “fine-tunes” the human body.
Exercise
To be maximally effective for therapy or health enhancement, an
exercise prescription must fulfill certain basic requirements: It must
be a daily activity (7 days a week); it must be fun, not painful or
excessively fatiguing; and it must fit an individual’s preferences. The
selected activities must be readily available, not distant or difficult
to reach—and preferably be close to the home or workplace. The clothes,
equipment and/or club membership associated with the activity must be
inexpensive. Ideally, the activity should not depend on other people
(team, class or partners), but should permit group participation if
desired. And finally, the activity must be suitable for lifelong
participation.
The major form of aerobic exercise should be (walking, running,
cycling, swimming or cross-country skiing). Variety is an important part
of the prescription: At least two or preferably three different
activities are recommended, such as walking-running-tennis or
walking-cycling-swimming.
For a normal-weight woman, if the goal is to maintain this weight
over time, normal-weight women need 60 minutes a day of moderate
exercise in order to maintain a healthy weight, researchers have found
in a recent study. Those who exercised fewer than 420 minutes a week
gained significantly more weight than those who met this target, I-Min
Lee of Brigham & Women's Hospital in Boston, and colleagues reported in
the March 24/31, 2010 issue of the
Journal of the American Medical Association. 30
The choice of exercise should be guided by individual preference
and previous experience. Walking and running are most often recommended
because they don’t require special training or skills. They are
inexpensive, readily available, safe and suitable for doing alone or
with others. The acronym DFALIVE is helpful to guide a patient’s
exercise prescription: Daily, Fun, Available, Lifelong, Independent,
Variety, Endurance.
Slide24
Continuity of Care
As qualified age management practitioners, we closely monitor our
patients through regularly scheduled blood tests, diagnostic evaluations
and ongoing communication. We also encourage our patients to continue
with their primary physicians; we must frequently keep their primary
physicians well-informed of a patient’s progress.
Patients may remain on their programs for as long as they desire to
maintain their vigor and experience the other benefits. Should they wish
to stop the program, patients shouldn’t be concerned about sudden rapid
aging; they will simply continue to age at the rate they experienced
prior to going on age-management protocols.
While some patients undergoing hormone modulation feel results
within days, it generally takes three to six months to titrate an
individual’s hormone levels. The placebo effect shouldn’t be discounted,
but careful monitoring through blood tests objectively shows the
practitioner how the therapy is working. Frequently, patients will begin
to notice progress by what they don’t feel (sick, tired, moody, etc.).
Much of the supplementation or modulation can be accomplished
through pills, capsules and gels. It is important to note that human
Growth Hormone—only prescribed for individuals with proven adult
deficiencies—breaks down if taken orally. The only truly effective way
to obtain its benefits, at this time, is by subcutaneous injection. This
procedure is easily learned by the adult growth hormone deficient
patient and becomes routine.
References
Post Test
|